Should languages be free to learn?

Introduction: Where I stand on this.

As someone who speaks about one and a third languages (Good English and barely passable Japanese.), it has often struck me as strange that learning languages is something that is often expensive to learn, and it is difficult to find a learning program worth it’s paper or bandwidth.

After having gone to Japan, I came across Tae Kim’s guide to Japanese, a well written guide that I’d wish I’d had before going, which is the work of a single individual and freely distributed freely to anyone who wants it.

This lead me to wonder why there exists an entire industry devoted to what a small office of linguists could kick out in a few months, post on the internet and then sell paper copies off for people’s convenience.

Further-more, while there may be those who lobby against it, this would be something well worth the government’s time, to create a definitive guide to speaking their country’s language and translating that guide into as many other languages as possible as a way of making it easy for others to integrate into a society.

The situation at hand.

Let me start by saying that this isn’t a case of “What if?” but something that began more than five years ago1 but may yet need to pick up some serious speed. With things like Tae Kim’s excellent guide and Wikibooks, the idea that something known by the population of an entire country should be kept as something for those who pay for it is going to go out of style faster than the idea of paying in the range of £20 for an album with five good tracks on it if you’re lucky.

The collapse of Nova (Japan’s biggest English school franchise.) in 2007 really brought home how much people pay to learn something that should have a single, concise, and documented guide (Varied  for region, i.e. British and American for English.). A single website that will teach you, through words, sound and video, how to go from knowing literally nothing about how to speak or write a language to having enough competency to then learn from others (A leaving-the-nest scenario.).

The need to communicate with other humans while learning is a problem that would need to be solved in conjunction with this, but combining Skype with a system similar to Rhino Spike (A service where you speak phrases in your language in return for phrases spoken in another.) may be the beginnings of another way to facilitate such things.

The wider implications.

Given what the internet can now deliver in terms of multimedia, we are at the point where, once a system has been established for teaching people how to do things, in the same way that wikis have been recognised at the standard repository for written knowledge and documentation, the wiki learning system (For want of a better piece of jargon.) should hopefully replicate naturally.

In a sense, it is not the knowledge or people what need to be created, merely the standard for freely communicated knowledge. Wikipedia appeared and now there are wikis for everything ranging from traveling the world (WikiTravel.) to the long and varied fiction of Star Wars (Wookiepedia.), once someone properly creates a structure for learning topics to the point it starts replicating, it’s time to think about selling up in the Teach Yourself sector.

In conclusion.

The recent years have seen the event of creating a single repository of knowledge when it comes to encyclopedia style collections of facts. Going forward, organising these facts into an easier to learn format than can be easily replicated for various sorts of skills.

In short: We’ve got reference books down as far as wikis go, but complete how-to courses are going to need someone to arrive at a recognized standard. The sooner the better.

1Assuming Tae Kim’s guide was around for a few years before I heard of it.
Image is made up of the Wikipedia
logo and this mock up by Ryanhagemandesign.

Posted in: Uncategorized by Fred No Comments

The Super Solar Charger

A long, long time ago. In a galaxy far, far away. I set about trying to move all my stuff to USB power so that I could, one day, charge everything on the go using a charger with a USB socket. This may also be of interest to you if you’re looking to move your house over rechargeable.

Phase 1: Let’s USB!

The first stage of this project, getting all my gadgets charging from the USB hub on my desk, was possibly the hardest part. While it was easy to find USB charging cables which would charge my Nokia 6630, my Ipod Classic OR my DS Lite, and sometimes two, finding one what would charge all three proved to be impossible.

In the end I got three separate chargers which all used the same interchangeable connector.

I cleaned and decorated, using CD label stickers, a used pipe tobacco tin to keep it all in. I also lined the tin with bubble-wrap to keep rattling down. Foam might also work.

On a side note: Some Nokia phones won’t charge with the 500mA x 5V provided by USB and need a dongle with an up-volter.

Phase 2: Portable Powerhouse!

While there are already portable power solutions like the Freeloader and Powermonkey products, you don’t get a whole lot for what you pay.

My biggest problem was that, with a single, non-removable battery, you could forget to charge the item itself for quite some time and be caught short when it mattered. Something that used AAs, of which I have an abundance, would mean I could always keep some extra charge in my bag (It also means I could carry extra when I needed.).

I was browsing around Maplin when I came across an obscure little product, the Camelion Solar AA Charger which is basically, a solar panel, a place for 4 AA (Or 2 AAA) batteries and a USB port. So you charge the batteries by solar, USB or external charger and then charge your gadgets from there. It also has a rudimentary battery tester, to let you keep an eye on how much charge you have left.

Side note: Solar or USB charging 4 AA batteries is going to take a long time. Best to charge them using an external charger and then use the USB and solar to replace what power you use.

Phase 3: The Greatest Charger!

Today, the fourth AA battery charger I own came (I also have two Camera battery chargers.); An Energizer Quattro, who’s four channels meant that I could finally charge batteries in odd number (Or any mix I felt like.) without risking leakage.

Background: Most battery chargers charge AAs two to a channel. This means you have to have pairs of the same brand and type of battery which have both been used up to roughly the same amount. This leaves you with a lot of mis-matched batteries when gadgets need an odd number.

The Quattro only costs about £12 on Ebay and comes with an odd addition: A set of 4 x 2450mAh AA batteries, which are close to twice the standard capacity of Energizer’s usual rechargeable AAs, giving the Camelion Solar Charger a battery of almost 10,000mAh (10Ah.). They are slightly longer than standard AAs, a bit fatter and noticeably heavier; really stretching the AA standard.

Conclusion.

I am now all set!

Posted in: Uncategorized by Fred 2 Comments

On realizing how different games should be.

It’s rare that I just post something I like, but some things are far too awesome to keep to myself.

Posted in: Uncategorized by Fred No Comments

Silent PC: Project Complete!

With today’s arrival of a new GPU cooler, My near-silent computer project draws to a close. While not utterly silent (I’m not buying an SSD.), gone are the whining and rattling noises. Sitting at my desk, it’s hard enough to hear (Probably harder once I get used to it.) and lying on my bed (I have one of those bunk beds with the desk at the bottom.), I really have to strain to hear anything. It is truly a good day!

Next Project!

For my next project (Not sure if I should keep the headphones on the back-burner.), it being earth day today, I’m feeling like doing something plant related. Maybe have a go at making one of the contraptions from the guys over at Window Farms.

Posted in: Uncategorized by Fred No Comments

Things on hold.

Between purging the forces of evil (Read: Cleaning extensive bloatware from people’s computers.), among other work and Ebuyer taking a week to ship things they already had in stock: Current projects are on hold until the weekend. I still mean to walk up to the audiologist’s to look at getting my ear impressions made.

Mainstream Comics = Superficial? (At least on the surface.)

I’ve also been giving some thought to what exactly it is I mean by “Unusual” when it comes to comics. I feel that one of the defining traits that set what I’m looking for apart from most of the comics I see in the comic shop are that much of the usual super hero/sci-fi/fantasy fare appears to be, at least on the surface, concerned with what is on the surface (Larger than life characters, Awesome set-pieces, The stuff that makes you go “Oooh coorrr blimey”.) and, less trying to sell themselves on things like character depth and

Some may have noticed the title effectively states “Comics = Superficially Superficial” which I think is accurate. Comics, on the surface, seem to focus only on the surface. If they have depth, they sure aren’t trying to tell us about it.

Finding the right word to sum up “Non-superficial.” to use in the tag line for this site is proving difficult.

[This point needs more researching.]

Posted in: Uncategorized by Fred No Comments